Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Intentionally Hostile
This story indicates Escondido is making itself "intentionally hostile" to illegal aliens.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/immigration/la-me-escondido13-2008jul13,0,5880010.story Hooray for Escondido!
That's exactly what we should have, an environment that is hostile in every respect to illegal aliens; life here should be unbearable for them -- so they'll go back to their home country and stay there until they can come here legally.
I think liberals like Obama think the same way about illegal immigration as they do about the oil crisis. On illegal immigration they say it's just too big of a problem and too late to do anything about it; they blame conservatives for not having solved the matter -- when in fact liberal stonewalling has long been a serious factor in prolonging the problem. They say a wall won't solve the problem. On energy, they say drilling won't solve the problem, it's too little too late. Why is that? Because they have been busy preventing the drilling for so long that drilling now won't have an immediate affect.
Build the wall now and drill now -- both are crucial elements in the solutions to the respective problems. Neither is the sole solution.
I don't trust McCain and while I admire and respect him for his service to our nation am not enthusiastic about the prospect of his occupation of the oval office. McCain praises TR as a conservative (yet TR was not a conservative president) but McCain lacks the presence, enthusiasm and inspiration that TR seemed to have. Whereas, TR was a political fighter, McCain has failed to exhibit any serious personal ability to go after BHO on important issues. On the other hand, I remain "intentionally hostile" to BHO. His own words, as well of the activities and statements of his wife and associates clearly define him as an enemy to the United States. His record as the most liberal senator of his time, his inexperience, reliance upon race exploitation, appearance and hollow rhetoric over substance make him the worst of the two.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/immigration/la-me-escondido13-2008jul13,0,5880010.story Hooray for Escondido!
That's exactly what we should have, an environment that is hostile in every respect to illegal aliens; life here should be unbearable for them -- so they'll go back to their home country and stay there until they can come here legally.
I think liberals like Obama think the same way about illegal immigration as they do about the oil crisis. On illegal immigration they say it's just too big of a problem and too late to do anything about it; they blame conservatives for not having solved the matter -- when in fact liberal stonewalling has long been a serious factor in prolonging the problem. They say a wall won't solve the problem. On energy, they say drilling won't solve the problem, it's too little too late. Why is that? Because they have been busy preventing the drilling for so long that drilling now won't have an immediate affect.
Build the wall now and drill now -- both are crucial elements in the solutions to the respective problems. Neither is the sole solution.
I don't trust McCain and while I admire and respect him for his service to our nation am not enthusiastic about the prospect of his occupation of the oval office. McCain praises TR as a conservative (yet TR was not a conservative president) but McCain lacks the presence, enthusiasm and inspiration that TR seemed to have. Whereas, TR was a political fighter, McCain has failed to exhibit any serious personal ability to go after BHO on important issues. On the other hand, I remain "intentionally hostile" to BHO. His own words, as well of the activities and statements of his wife and associates clearly define him as an enemy to the United States. His record as the most liberal senator of his time, his inexperience, reliance upon race exploitation, appearance and hollow rhetoric over substance make him the worst of the two.
// posted by Zerin Hood @ 8:56 PM 
